Bad cabling is everywhere. Cables pulled through tight bends. Patch panels where nobody can tell which cable goes where. Fiber runs terminated poorly that pass continuity but fail under load. Labels that were inconsistent from day one and are now illegible.
It was installed by someone who moved on, and now it’s your problem. We fix it.
Correcting poorly installed or documented cabling infrastructure. That might mean re-terminating fiber runs, rebuilding rack cable management, establishing or correcting a labeling system, documenting what’s actually installed, or systematically replacing runs that fail current standards.
Remediation projects start with an honest assessment of what’s there and what it would take to make it right. Sometimes the answer is targeted fixes. Sometimes it’s a full rebuild. We’ll tell you which is which — and why.
Most remediation projects involve some combination of:
– Fiber runs terminated with improper cleaning or technique, passing continuity but with excessive insertion loss
– Copper runs installed before Cat6A requirements that can’t support current bandwidth needs
– Cable management that was never organized, making any maintenance work disproportionately difficult
– Labeling that was inconsistent, partially done, or never updated after moves and changes
– Documentation that describes an original design, not what was actually installed
We’ve seen all of it. None of it surprises us.
By risk. Runs that are actively failing or at high risk of failure come first, followed by infrastructure that’s limiting performance, followed by documentation and labeling work. We give you a prioritized list with our recommendation.
Yes. Remediation in live facilities follows the same approach as our expansion work — maintenance windows for anything that requires taking down active connections, careful documentation before touching anything, rollback plans for each step.
Often specific problems can be addressed without a full rebuild. We’ll tell you honestly when targeted fixes are the right approach and when a fuller remediation is more cost-effective long-term.
